A heart transplant center experience with basiliximab induction strategies: A double edged sword?

BACKGROUND: The use of induction immunosuppression for heart transplantation (HT) is debated given the uncertain benefit and potential risks of infection and malignancy. METHODS: This is a retrospective single-center analysis of 475 consecutive HT recipients from 2003 to 2020 grouped by use of induction with basiliximab group (BG) and the no basiliximab group (NBG). Subgroup analysis by era compared pre-2016 standard-basiliximab (BX) induction and 2016-2020 with selective-BX use as part of a calcineurin-inhibitor-sparing regimen. RESULTS: When adjusted for confounders (sex, age, PRA, eGFR), the BG was less likely to have acute cellular rejection (ACR) (OR.42, p < .001), but had more antibody mediated rejection (AMR) (OR 11.7, p < .001) and more cardiac allograft vasculopathy (CAV) (OR 3.8, p = .04). There was no difference between BG and NBG in the incidence of malignancies or infections. When stratified by era (pre-2016 vs. 2016-2020), ACR remained less common in the BG than the NBG (36% vs. 50%, p = .045) groups, while AMR remained more common (9.7 vs. 0% p = .005). There was no significant difference in conditional survival comparing pre-and post-2016 NBG (HR 2.20 (95% CI.75-6.43); however, both pre-2016 BG and post-2016 BG have significantly higher mortality (HR 2.37 [95% CI 1.02-5.50) and HR 2.69 (95% CI 1.08-6.71), p = .045 and.03, respectively]. CONCLUSION: Basiliximab reduces the incidence of ACR but increases the risk of AMR, CAV, and may be associated with increased mortality. Mechanistic studies are needed to describe a potential T-cell-escape mechanism with enhanced humoral immunity.

Extracellular vesicles as potential diagnostic markers for kidney allograft rejection.

Kidney transplantation is a highly effective treatment for end-stage kidney disease. However, allograft rejection remains a significant clinical challenge in kidney transplant patients. Although kidney allograft biopsy is the gold-standard diagnostic method, it is an invasive procedure. Since the current monitoring methods, including screening of serum creatinine and urinary protein, are not of sufficient sensitivity, there is a need for effective post-transplant monitoring to detect allograft rejection at an early stage. Extracellular vesicles are vesicles with a lipid bilayer that originate from different cell types in pathological and physiological conditions. The content of extracellular vesicles reflects the status of cells at the time of their production. This review comprehensively summarizes clinical, in vivo, and in vitro reports that highlight the potential of extracellular vesicles as diagnostic biomarkers for kidney allograft rejection. Clarification would facilitate differentiation between rejection and non-rejection and identification of the mechanisms involved in the allograft rejection. Despite increasing evidence, further research is necessary to establish the clinical utility of extracellular vesicles in the diagnosis and monitoring of allograft rejection in kidney transplant recipients. Using extracellular vesicles as non-invasive biomarkers for diagnosis of kidney allograft rejection could have tremendous benefits in improving patient outcomes and reduce the need for invasive procedures.

Renal Transplant in Elderly End-Stage Renal Disease Patients: Impact of Comorbidities and Posttransplant Adverse Events on Outcomes.

OBJECTIVES: Elderly renal transplant continues to be debated because of age-related factors affecting transplant success and long-term prognosis. We investigated the effects ofrecipient age and predictors of renal transplant outcomes in elderly renal transplant recipients. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed 506 patients who had a first renal transplant between January 2010 and December 2020; there were 165 recipients aged ≥60 years (elderly) and 341 recipients aged <60 years (young).We collected recipient, donor, and transplant characteristics and assessed 1-, 3-, and 5-year overall patient and death-censored graft survival and risk factors influencing outcomes ofrenal transplant in elderly recipients. RESULTS: Elderly recipients showed significantly lower 1-, 3-, and 5-year patient survival rates (96.3%, 89.8%, 80.9%) than young recipients (98.8%, 98.5%, 97.8%; P < .001). However, death-censored graft survival rates were not significantly different (P = .459) between elderly (96.3%, 94.3%, 93.2%) and young recipients (97.7%, 97.0%, 93.9%). Advanced recipient age was identified as an independent risk factor for patient survival, irrespective of donor age. In elderly recipients, male gender (hazard ratio 2.013; 95% CI, 1.110-3.649), pretransplant cardiovascular disease (hazard ratio 1.774; 95% CI, 1.030-3.553), and posttransplant chestinfection (hazard ratio 2.421; 95% CI, 1.439-4.076) were significant predictors of inferior patient survival. Proteinuria at 1 month (hazard ratio 1.006; 95% CI, 1.000-1.011) and low estimated glomerular filtration rate at 3 months (hazard ratio 0.943; 95% CI, 0.899-0.988) posttransplant were early predictors of worse death-censored graft survival. CONCLUSIONS: Elderly renaltransplantrecipients showed promising 5-year patient and death-censored graft survival, exceeding 80%, despite higher mortality risk compared with young recipients. Optimizing outcomes of elderly renal transplant necessitates a multifaceted approach encompassing meticulous pretransplant cardiovascular disease assessment, rigorous posttransplant chest infection prevention and management, and proactive monitoring for early posttransplant kidney dysfunction, to permit timely intervention.

The role of anticomplement therapy in the management of the kidney allograft.

As the number of patients living with kidney failure grows, the need also grows for kidney transplantation, the gold standard kidney replacement therapy that provides a survival advantage. This may result in an increased rate of transplantation from HLA-mismatched donors that increases the rate of antibody-mediated rejection (AMR), which already is the leading cause of allograft failure. Plasmapheresis, intravenous immunoglobulin therapy, anti-CD20 therapies (i.e., rituximab), bortezomib and splenectomy have been used over the years to treat AMR as well as to prevent AMR in high-risk sensitized kidney transplant recipients. Eculizumab and ravulizumab are monoclonal antibodies targeting the C5 protein of the complement pathway and part of the expanding field of anticomplement therapies, which is not limited to kidney transplant recipients, and also includes complement-mediated microangiopathic hemolytic anemia, paroxysmal nocturnal hemoglobinuria, and ANCA-vasculitis. In this narrative review, we summarize the current knowledge concerning the pathophysiological background and use of anti-C5 strategies (eculizumab and ravulizumab) and C1-esterase inhibitor in AMR, either to prevent AMR in high-risk desensitized patients or to treat AMR as first-line or rescue therapy and also to treat de novo thrombotic microangiopathy in kidney transplant recipients.

Protocol liver biopsy predicts graft survival after liver transplantation.

BACKGROUND: The use of protocol liver biopsy to monitor liver allograft status remains controversial. There is limited data from modern transplantation populations that includes protocol biopsies to evaluate its value in predicting clinical outcomes. METHODS: All protocol liver biopsies were identified from 875 patients who underwent liver transplantation at Helsinki University Hospital between 2000 and 2019. Each histologic component was analyzed for its ability to predict long-term outcomes, especially graft survival. We determined the frequency of significant biopsy findings based on the Banff working group definition. Liver function tests (LFTs) and clinical markers were evaluated for their ability to predict significant biopsy findings. RESULTS: In total, 867 protocol liver biopsies were analyzed. Significant findings were identified in 20.1% of the biopsies. In the first protocol biopsy, steatohepatitis (hazard ratio [HR] 3.504, p = .03) and moderate or severe congestion (HR 3.338, p = .04) predicted graft loss. The presence of cholangitis (HR 2.563, p = .04), necrosis (HR 7.635, p < .001), mild congestion (HR 4.291, p = .009), and significant biopsy finding (HR 2.540, p = .02) predicted inferior death-censored graft survival. While the degree of elevation of LFTs was positively associated with significant biopsy findings, the discrimination was poor (AUC .572-.622). Combined LFTs and clinical risk factors remained suboptimal for discriminating significant biopsy findings (AUC .696). CONCLUSIONS: Our findings support the use of protocol liver biopsies after liver transplantation since they frequently revealed changes associated with long-term outcomes, even when LFTs were normal.

Routine screening for HLA Antibodies in Heart Transplant patients-Does it affect clinical decision making?

BACKGROUND: We aimed to assess outcomes in patients with and without donor specific antibodies (DSA) and to evaluate the relationship between DSA presence and graft function, cardiac allograft vasculopathy (CAV), and mortality. METHODS: The study population comprises 193 consecutive long-term heart transplanted (HTx) patients who underwent DSA surveillance between 2016 and 2022. The patients were prospectively screened for CAV through serial coronary angiograms, graft function impairment through serial echocardiograms, and cardiac biomarkers. The patients were followed from the first DSA measurement until death, 5 years follow-up or right censuring on the 30th of June 2023. RESULTS: DSAs were detected in 50 patients using a cut-off at MFI ≥1000 and 45 patients using a cut-off at ≥2000 MFI. The median time since HTx was 9.0 years [3.0-14.4]. DSA positive patients had poorer graft function and higher values of NT-proBNP and troponin T, and more prevalent CAV than DSA negative patients. In total, 25 patients underwent endomyocardial biopsies due to DSA presence while another eight patients underwent endomyocardial biopsies for other reasons. Histological antibody mediated rejection (AMR) signs were seen in three biopsies. During a median follow-up of five years [4.7-5], a total of 41 patients died. Mortality rates did not differ between DSA positive and DSA negative patients (HR 1.2, 95% CI .6-2.4). DSA positive patients were more likely to experience CAV progression than DSA negative patients (HR 2.7, 95% CI 1.5-4.8) CONCLUSIONS: Routine screening reveals DSA in approximately 25% of long-term HTx patients but is rarely related to histopathological AMR signs. DSA presence was associated with poorer graft function and more prevalent and progressive CAV. However, DSA positive patients had similar survival rates to DSA negative patients.

Utility of a fusion protein T-cell co-stimulation blocker Belatacept in heart transplant recipients: Real world experience from a high volume center.

BACKGROUND: Belatacept (BTC), a fusion protein, selectively inhibits T-cell co-stimulation by binding to the CD80 and CD86 receptors on antigen-presenting cells (APCs) and has been used as immunosuppression in adult renal transplant recipients. However, data regarding its use in heart transplant (HT) recipients are limited. This retrospective cohort study aimed to delineate BTC's application in HT, focusing on efficacy, safety, and associated complications at a high-volume HT center. METHODS: A retrospective cohort study was conducted of patients who underwent HT between January 2017 and December 2021 and subsequently received BTC as part of their immunosuppressive regimen. Twenty-one HT recipients were identified. Baseline characteristics, history of rejection, and indication for BTC use were collected. Outcomes included renal function, graft function, allograft rejection and mortality. Follow-up data were collected through December 2023. RESULTS: Among 776 patients monitored from January 2017 to December 2021 21 (2.7%) received BTC treatment. Average age at transplantation was 53 years (± 12 years), and 38% were women. BTC administration began, on average, 689 [483, 1830] days post-HT. The primary indications for BTC were elevated pre-formed donor-specific antibodies in highly sensitized patients (66.6%) and renal sparing (23.8%), in conjunction with reduced calcineurin inhibitor dosage. Only one (4.8%) patient encountered rejection within a year of starting BTC. Graft function by echocardiography remained stable at 6 and 12 months posttreatment. An improvement was observed in serum creatinine levels (76.2% of patients), decreasing from a median of 1.58 to 1.45 (IQR [1.0-2.1] to [1.1-1.9]) over 12 months (p = .054). eGFR improved at 3 and 6 months compared with 3 months pre- BTC levels; however, this was not statistically significant (p = .24). Treatment discontinuation occurred in seven patients (33.3%) of whom four (19%) were switched back to full dose CNI. Infections occurred in 11 patients (52.4%), leading to BTC discontinuation in 4 patients (19%). CONCLUSION: In this cohort, BTC therapy was used as alternative immunosuppression for management of highly sensitized patients or for renal sparing. BTC therapy when combined with CNI dose reduction resulted in stabilization in renal function as measured through renal surrogate markers, which did not, however, reach statistical significance. Patients on BTC maintained a low rejection rate and preserved graft function. Infections were common during BTC therapy and were associated with medication pause/discontinuation in 19% of patients. Further randomized studies are needed to assess the efficacy and safety of BTC in HT recipients.

A2/A2B to B kidney transplantation outcomes: A single center 7-year experience.

INTRODUCTION: Data on long-term outcomes following A2/A2B to B kidney transplants since the 2014 kidney allocation system (KAS) changes are few. The primary aim of this study is to report our 7-year experience with A2/A2B to B kidney transplants and to compare post-transplant outcomes of A2/A2B to a concurrent group of B to B kidney transplants. Additionally, the study evaluates the impact of pre-transplant anti-A1 titers on survival outcomes in A2/A2B transplants. METHODS: This retrospective, single-center analysis included all adults who received A2/A2B to B deceased donor kidney transplants from December 2014 to June 2021 compared to B to B recipients. The effects of pre-transplant IgM/IgG titers, stratified as ≤1:8 and ≥1:16, on death-censored, rejection-free, and overall graft survival were tested. RESULTS: Fifty-three A2/A2B and 114 B to B adults were included with a median follow-up time of 32 months. Overall graft survival, patient survival, and rejection-free graft survival did not differ between the two groups. There were no differences between the groups' overall kidney function values (p > .80) or their temporal trajectories (time by group interaction p > .11). Unadjusted death-censored graft survival was lower in A2/A2B to B compared to B recipients (p = .03), but the effect was not significant (p = .195) after adjusting for any readmissions (p = .96), rejection episodes (p < .001) or BK infection (p = .76). We did not detect an effect of pre-transplant titer group on death-censored (p = .59), rejection-free (p = .61), or overall graft survival (p = .26) CONCLUSIONS: A2/A2B to B kidney transplants have comparable overall patient and graft survival, rejection-free graft survival, and longitudinal renal function compared to B to B transplants at our center. Allograft survival outcomes were not significantly different between patients with low and high pre-transplant anti-A1 IgM/IgG titers.

Long-term outcomes for pediatric heart transplant recipients transitioning to adult care teams.

BACKGROUND: There are limited data evaluating the success of a structured transition plan specifically for pediatric heart transplant (HT) recipients following their transfer of care to an adult specialist. We sought to identify risk factors for poor adherence, graft failure, and mortality following the transfer of care to adult HT care teams. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed all patients who underwent transition from the pediatric to adult HT program at our center between January 2011 and June 2021. Demographic characteristics, comorbid conditions, and psychosocial history were collected at the time of HT, the time of transition, and the most recent follow-up. Adverse events including mortality, graft rejection, infection, and renal function were also captured before and after the transition. RESULTS: Seventy-two patients were identified (54.1% male, 54.2% Caucasian). Mean age at the time of transition was 23 years after a median of 11.6 years in the pediatric program. The use of calcineurin inhibitors was associated with reduced mortality (HR .04, 95% CI .0-.6, p = .015), while prior psychiatric hospitalization (HR 45.3, 95% CI, 6.144-333.9, p = .0001) was associated with increased mortality following transition. Medication nonadherence and young age at the time of transition were markers for high-risk individuals prior to the transition of care. CONCLUSIONS: Transition of HT recipients from a pediatric program to an adult program occurs during a vulnerable time of emerging adulthood, and we have identified risk factors for mortality following transition. Development of a formalized transition plan with a large multidisciplinary team with focused attention on high-risk patients, including those with psychiatric comorbidities, may favorably influence outcomes.

Pharmacotherapy in the heart transplant recipient: A primer for nurse clinicians and pharmacists.

Heart transplantation (HT) is the definitive treatment for eligible patients with end-stage heart disease. A major complication of HT is allograft rejection which can lead to graft dysfunction and death. The guiding principle of chronic immunosuppression therapy is to prevent rejection of the transplanted organ while avoiding oversuppression of the immune system, which can cause opportunistic infections and malignancy. The purpose of this review is to describe immunosuppressive management of the HT recipient-including agent-specific pharmacology and pharmacokinetics, outcomes data, adverse effects, clinical considerations, and recent guideline updates. We will also provide recommendations for medical prophylaxis of immunosuppressed patients based on the most recent clinical guidelines. Additionally, we highlight the importance of medical therapy adherence and the effect of social determinants of health on the long-term management of HT. HT recipients are a complex and high-risk population. The objective of this review is to describe basic pharmacotherapy in HT and implications for nurses and pharmacists.

Effectiveness of combined plasma cell therapy and costimulation blockade based desensitization regimen in heart transplant candidates.

BACKGROUND: Desensitization is one of the strategies to reduce antibodies and facilitate heart transplantation in highly sensitized patients. We describe our center's desensitization experience with combination of plasma cell (PC) depletion therapy (with proteasome inhibitor or daratumumab) and costimulation blockade (with belatacept). METHODS: We reviewed five highly sensitized patients who underwent desensitization therapy with plasma cell depletion and costimulation blockade. We evaluated the response to therapy by measuring the changes in cPRA, average MFI, and number of positive beads > 5000MFI. RESULTS: Five patients, mean age of 56 (37-66) years with average cPRA of 98% at 5000 MFI underwent desensitization therapy. After desensitization, mean cPRA decreased from 98% to 70% (p = .09), average number of beads > 5000 MFI decreased from 59 to 37 (p = .15), and average MFI of beads > 5000 MFI decreased from 16713 to 13074 (p = .26). CONCLUSION: Combined PC depletion and CoB could be a reasonable strategy for sustained reduction in antibodies in highly sensitized patients being listed for heart transplantation.

Cannabis use is associated with reduced access to kidney transplantation and an increased risk of acute rejection post-transplant.

BACKGROUND: The association between cannabis use and access to waitlisting, transplantation, and post-transplant outcomes remains uncertain. METHODS: Patients referred for kidney transplant (KT) to the University Health Network from January 1, 2003, to June 30, 2020, and followed until December 31, 2020, were included. Predictors of reported cannabis use were examined using a logistic regression model. The association between cannabis use and time to clearance for KT, undergoing KT, and post-transplant outcomes was evaluated using Cox proportional hazards models. RESULTS: Among 3734 patients, the prevalence of reported cannabis use was 11.8%. Cannabis use was associated with a lower likelihood of KT clearance (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR] .82 [95% confidence interval (CI): .72, .94]). Once cleared for KT, cannabis use did not predict the subsequent receipt of KT (aHR .92, [95% CI: .79, 1.08]). Among 2091 KT recipients, cannabis use was associated with a higher likelihood of biopsy-proven acute rejection (aHR 1.55, [95% CI: 1.06, 2.27]). The relative hazard of death-censored graft failure was similarly elevated (aHR 1.60 [95% CI: .95, 2.72]). Cannabis use did not predict total graft failure (aHR 1.33 [95% CI: .90, 1.96]), death with graft function (aHR 1.06 [95% CI: .59, 1.89]), or hospital readmission in the first-year post-transplant (aHR 1.26 [95% CI: .95, 1.68]). CONCLUSIONS: Cannabis users have less access to transplantation and an increased risk of acute rejection, possibly leading to more graft loss. Further studies are warranted to understand possible mechanisms for the increased risk of allograft immune injury among cannabis users.

Recipient Pericardial Apolipoprotein Levels Might Be an Indicator of Worse Outcomes after Orthotopic Heart Transplantation.

BACKGROUND: End-stage heart failure (ESHF) leads to hypoperfusion and edema formation throughout the body and is accompanied by neurohormonal and immunological alterations. Orthotopic heart transplantation (HTX) has been used as a beneficial option for ESHF. Due to the shortage of donor hearts, the ideal matching and timing of donors and recipients has become more important. PURPOSE: In this study, our aim was to explore the relationship between the clinical outcomes of HTX and the cytokine and apolipoprotein profiles of the recipient pericardial fluid obtained at heart transplantation after opening the pericardial sac. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The clinical data and the interleukin, adipokine, and lipoprotein levels in the pericardial fluid of twenty HTX recipients were investigated. Outcome variables included primer graft dysfunction (PGD), the need for post-transplantation mechanical cardiac support (MCS), International Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation grade ≥2R rejection, and mortality. Recipient risk scores were also investigated. RESULTS: Leptin levels were significantly lower in patients with PGD than in those without PGD (median: 6.36 (IQR: 5.55-6.62) versus 7.54 (IQR = 6.71-10.44); p = 0.029). Higher ApoCII levels (median: 14.91 (IQR: 11.55-21.30) versus 10.31 (IQR = 10.02-13.07); p = 0.042) and ApoCIII levels (median: 60.32 (IQR: 43.00-81.66) versus 22.84 (IQR = 15.84-33.39); p = 0.005) were found in patients (n = 5) who died in the first 5 years after HTX. In patients who exhibited rejection (n = 4) in the first month after transplantation, the levels of adiponectin (median: 74.48 (IQR: 35.51-131.70) versus 29.96 (IQR: 19.86-42.28); p = 0.039), ApoCII (median: 20.11 (IQR: 13.06-23.54) versus 10.32 (IQR: 10.02-12.84); p = 0.007), and ApoCIII (median: 70.97 (IQR: 34.72-82.22) versus 26.33 (IQR: 17.18-40.17); p = 0.029) were higher than in the nonrejection group. Moreover, the pericardial thyroxine (T4) levels (median: 3.96 (IQR: 3.49-4.46) versus 4.69 (IQR: 4.23-5.77); p = 0.022) were lower in patients with rejection than in patients who did not develop rejection. CONCLUSION: Our results indicate that apolipoproteins can facilitate the monitoring of rejection and could be a useful tool in the forecasting of early and late complications.

Kidney Retransplantation in Children.

Pediatric kidney transplant recipients will likely require a retransplant in their lifetime. Although the significant advances in clinical management and newer immunosuppressive agents have had a significant effect to improve short-term allograft function, it is apparent that long-term allograft function remains suboptimal. Therefore, it is likely that most pediatric renal allograft recipients will require 1 or more retransplants during their lifetime. In the West, an increasing number of patients on the deceased donor wait list are awaiting a retransplant; in the US, 15% of current annual transplants are retransplants. Unfortunately, the use of a second or subsequent grafts in pediatric recipients has inferior long-term graft survival rates compared with initial grafts, with decreasing rates with each subsequent graft. Multiple issues influence the outcome of retransplant, with the most significant being the cause of the prior transplant failure. Nonadherenceassociated graft loss poses unresolved ethical issues that may affect a patient's access to retransplant. Graft nephrectomy prior to retransplant may benefit selected patients, but the effect of an in situ failed graft on the development of panel reactive antibodies remains to be definitively determined. It is important that these and other factors discussed in this presentation be taken into consideration during the counseling of families on the optimal approach for their child who requires a retransplant.

Delayed Graft Function in Pediatric Kidney Transplant: Risk Factors and Outcomes.

OBJECTIVES: We aimed to identify risk factors and outcomes of delayed graft function in pediatric kidney transplant. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This retrospective study included all kidney transplant recipients ≤19 years old followed up in our department for a period of 34 years, from January 1989 to December 2022. RESULTS: We included 113 kidney transplant recipients. Delayed graft function occurred in 17 cases (15%). Posttransplant red blood cell transfusion was strongly associated with delayed graft function (adjusted odds ratio = 23.91; 95% CI, 2.889-197.915). Use of allografts with multiple arteries and cold ischemia time >20 hours were risk factors for delayed graft function (adjusted odds ratio = 52.51 and 49.4; 95% CI, 2.576-1070.407 and 1.833-1334.204, respectively). Sex-matched transplants and living donors were protective factors for delayed graft function (adjusted odds ratio = 0.043 and 0.027; 95% CI, 0.005-0.344 and 0.003-0.247, respectively). Total HLA mismatches <3 played a protective role for delayed graft function (adjusted odds ratio = 0.114; 95% CI, 0.020-0.662), whereas transplant within compatible but different blood types increased the risk of delayed graft function (adjusted odds ratio = 20.54; 95% CI, 1.960- 215.263). No significant correlation was shown between delayed graft function and allograft survival (P = .190). Our study suggested delayed graft function as a key factor in allograft rejection-free survival (adjusted odds ratio = 3.832; 95% CI, 1.186-12.377). Delayed graft function was a negative factor for early graft function; patients with delayed graft function had a lower estimated glomerular filtration rate at discharge (P = .024) and at 3 (P = .034), 6 (P = .019), and 12 months (P = .011) posttransplant. CONCLUSIONS: Delayed graft function is a major determinant of early graft function and allograft rejection-free survival. Further research is required to establish proper preventive measures.

Lung transplantation in HIV seropositive recipients: An analysis of the UNOS registry.

BACKGROUND: Experience with lung transplantation (LT) in patients with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) is limited. Many studies have demonstrated the success of kidney and liver transplantation in HIV-seropositive (HIV+) patients. Our objective was to conduct a national registry analysis comparing LT outcomes in HIV+ to HIV-seronegative (HIV-) recipients. METHODS: The United Network for Organ Sharing database was queried to identify LTs performed in adult HIV+ patients between 2016 and 2023. Patients with unknown HIV status, multiorgan transplants, and redo transplants were excluded. The primary endpoints were mortality and graft rejection. Survival time was analyzed using Kaplan-Meier analysis. RESULTS: The study included 17 487 patients, 67 of whom were HIV+. HIV+ recipients were younger (59 vs. 62 years, p = .02), had higher pulmonary arterial pressure (28 vs. 25 mm Hg, p = .04), and higher lung allocation scores (47 vs. 41, p = .01) relative to HIV- recipients. There were no differences in graft/recipient survival time between groups. HIV+ recipients had higher rates of post-transplant dialysis (18% vs. 8.4%, p = .01), but otherwise had similar post-transplant outcomes to HIV-recipients. CONCLUSIONS: This national registry analysis suggests LT outcomes in HIV+ patients are not inferior to outcomes in HIV- patients and that well-selected HIV+ recipients can achieve comparable patient and graft survival rates relative to HIV- recipients.

Risk factors for renal dysfunction after isolated intestinal transplantation.

INTRODUCTION: Kidney dysfunction is a known complication of intestinal transplantation; however, the rate of development and risk factors for chronic kidney disease (CKD) remain poorly defined. METHODS: This was a single-center retrospective review of isolated adult intestinal allograft recipients from 2011 to 2019. Patients who died or experienced graft loss within 1-year or had a prior transplant were excluded. Estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) was calculated using the CKD-EPI equation at 0-, 6- and 12-months post-transplant, and multivariable linear regression was performed to identify variables associated with adjusted eGFR at 1-year. Independent variables included age, ethnicity, BMI, history of diabetes/hypertension, vasopressor use, TPN and stoma days, urinary or bloodstream infections, intravenous contrast exposure, rejection, concomitant immunosuppression, and time above the therapeutic range of tacrolimus. Variables with a p < .1 in univariate analysis were considered for multivariable modeling. RESULTS: Thirty-three patients were included with a mean age of 43.9 ± 13.0. A mean 42.3% decline in eGFR was observed at 1-year post-transplant, with 15.2% of patients developing new stage 4/5 CKD. Factors associated with a greater decline in adjusted eGFR in the univariate model included increasing age, decreased BMI, stoma days, and vasopressor use. In the adjusted multivariable model patient age (ß = -.77, p < .01) and stoma days (ß = -.06, p < .01) remained significant. Tacrolimus and sirolimus exposure were not associated with decline in eGFR at 1 year. CONCLUSIONS: Renal dysfunction is common following intestinal transplantation. The need for stoma creation should be carefully considered, and reversal should be performed when feasible for renal protection.

Association of Serum Osteoprotegerin With Vascular Calcification, and Cardiovascular and Graft Outcomes in Kidney Transplant Patients: Results From the KNOW-KT.

BACKGROUND: Vascular calcification and stiffness contribute to increased cardiovascular morbidity in patients with chronic kidney disease. This study investigated associations between serum osteoprotegerin (OPG) levels and vascular calcification or stiffness to assess cardiovascular and graft outcomes in kidney transplant patients. METHODS: The KoreaN cohort study for Outcome in patients With Kidney Transplantation was a prospective multicenter cohort study. Serum OPG levels were measured at baseline and 3 y after transplantation in 1018 patients. Patients were classified into high and low OPG groups according to median serum OPG levels. The median follow-up duration was 93.5 mo. RESULTS: The mean age was 45.8 ±â€…11.7 y and 62.9% were men. Patients with high OPG had significantly higher coronary artery calcium scores, abdominal aortic calcification scores, and brachial-ankle pulse wave velocities than those with lower OPG; these parameters remained significant for 5 y after transplantation. The 3-y OPG levels were lower than baseline values ( P < 0.001) and were positively correlated ( r = 0.42, P < 0.001). Multivariate Cox regression analysis showed that high OPG levels were significantly associated with posttransplant cardiovascular events ( P = 0.008) and death-censored graft loss ( P = 0.004). Similar findings regarding posttransplant cardiovascular events ( P = 0.012) and death-censored graft loss ( P = 0.037) were noted in patients with high OPG at the 3-y follow-up. Mediation analyses revealed that coronary artery calcium scores, abdominal aortic calcification scores, and brachial-ankle pulse wave velocities could act as mediators between serum OPG levels and posttransplant cardiovascular events. CONCLUSIONS: Serum OPG concentration is associated with vascular calcification and stiffness and could be a significant risk factor for cardiovascular outcomes and graft loss in patients undergoing kidney transplantation.